The data you need to reduce tariff bills by >99% already exists inside your engineering drawings. Nobody could read it at scale. Until now.
Section 232 tariffs apply 50% on steel and aluminum articles. For complex assemblies, you only owe duty on the regulated material inside — not the full assembly value. But proving it requires component-level data that is economically impossible to extract manually.
U.S. importers bore 92% of Section 301 tariff costs at peak. How much was overpayment on assemblies where the material value was a fraction of the landed cost?
A compliance engineer processes 3–5 drawings per day. A typical assembly has dozens to hundreds of components across thousands of drawings. The backlog makes granular analysis impossible.
Engineers with $150K+ salaries spend more than half their time pulling data from drawings for compliance. Not designing. Not innovating. Data entry.
Traditional supplier outreach for country-of-origin data gets <40% response rates over 6–12 months. Most vendors cannot answer the questions being asked.
Multi-modal AI reads your engineering drawings the way a senior mechanical engineer does — extracting material, calculating weight from geometry, and classifying every component to 10-digit HTS codes.
Drop a folder of assembly PDFs into the platform
OCR, document classification, material extraction
Assembly tree reconstructed from flat drawing files
10-digit HTS codes, Section 232/301 flags
Pre-filled Form 7501 in Excel, locked & timestamped
Not just text extraction. Material densities are cross-checked against physics. Weights are calculated from geometry. Impossible values are flagged. This is engineering analysis — validated against the laws of physics.
Not a pilot. Not a projection. These are production results from deployed systems generating measurable savings today.
The same AI extraction engine powers five analysis modules. Your drawing data is extracted once and reused across every play.
HTS codes, Section 232/301 flags, pro-rata duty splitting
Automated review against ASME Y14.5 and company standards
Material substitutions, tolerance optimization, DFM analysis
Automated vendor data collection with magic links
Assembly tree rebuilt from flat files with no PLM metadata
Human-in-the-loop governance at every step. No classification proceeds without an engineer's explicit sign-off.
An engineer reviews and approves before any classification proceeds
Pre-filled Form 7501 data — locked, timestamped, filing-ready
Every data point traces to the specific drawing and coordinate
Your drawings never leave your firewall. SOC-2 & CMMC path.
We analyze your actual engineering drawings during the demo. You walk out with a pre-filled CBP Form 7501 export — your parts, your materials, your tariff exposure.