For Procurement & Supply Chain

Find the money you're already leaving on the table.

Same parts at every site. Different suppliers. Different prices. SourceOptima classifies every component by its real manufacturing requirements, then ranks the cost spreads by impact. No new suppliers to qualify. No org change. Just your data, finally connected.

$1B+ in scope · 200K+ SKUs · 4,000+ suppliers · 50+ sites
The problem

Procurement is organized by org chart.
Manufacturing is organized by capability.

The result: redundant suppliers, unexploited volume leverage, and no way to answer "who in our supply base can actually make this?"

Symptom

Same part, three prices

A 5-axis titanium component bought in Oregon at $420. A near-identical part bought in Czechia at $1,260. Different suppliers. No one knows.

Symptom

Suppliers who outsource quietly

Self-reported capability sheets say one thing. Delivery records tell another. Suppliers who broker work they can't fulfill in-house are a quality and IP risk.

Symptom

Categories drawn around acquisitions

M&A leaves you with PLM systems that don't talk, part numbers that overlap, and category lines drawn by who acquired whom — not by what gets made.

Symptom

Sourcing decisions without engineering context

Purchase history tells you what you bought. Drawings tell you what you actually needed. The combination is where the leverage lives.

Manufacturing taxonomy

Categories drawn by what parts actually need.

SourceOptima aggregates structured part profiles into a hierarchical classification: process > complexity > size > material > tolerance band. Each leaf becomes a sourcing category — independent of who designed the part or which org bought it.

  • Volume leverage — surface where consolidation actually saves money.
  • Make-vs-buy — see capability gaps in your existing supply base.
  • Supplier qualification — pre-screen by what each supplier has demonstrably built.
MANUFACTURING TAXONOMY All machined parts Mill 3-axis 5-axis 5-axis · Ti · ±0.001 Lathe / Mill-turn EDM / Sheet SELECTED LEAF · 5-axis · Ti · ±0.001 · <100mm 14 SKUs · 4 sites · 4 suppliers · $4.2M annual $2.4M cost spread · 2 suppliers cover 90% → Consolidate to Kemet (Oregon) · est. save $1.6M ACTIONABLE
Supplier intelligence

Capability profiles built from delivery history — not brochures.

SourceOptima cross-references what each supplier claims they can do against what they've actually delivered. Suppliers whose stated capabilities exceed delivery history get flagged — a strong signal that they outsource orders they can't fulfill in-house.

  • Delivered capability fingerprint — process, axis count, materials, tolerance bands.
  • Claim-vs-delivery diff — flag overstated capabilities.
  • Quality & on-time signals — layered onto the same profile.
SUPPLIER · KEMET PRECISION 5-axis Tight tol. Titanium Volume Quality On-time Delivered Claimed ⚠ 2 axes overstated
Case study

What it looked like in production.

Anonymized — global manufacturer, mechanical / machined engineered components category.

Phase 1 · 30 days

Hundreds of thousands of files ingested

Multi-hundred-GB drawing repository · tens of thousands of part folders. No human reviewed any of it. The platform did.

Phase 1 · 30 days

Hundreds of millions reconciled

Cross-referenced against ERP line items. ~50% matched on first pass; coverage grows as namespace gaps close.

Discovery

98.7% engineering / 0% procurement

An entire site's engineering drawings had zero procurement records anywhere in the company. Hundreds of unique part numbers, invisible without cross-reference.

Deliverable

Per-stakeholder workbooks

Hundreds of missing items for the drawings team to locate. Dozens of orphan parts for the procurement SME to add. One workbook per person, ranked by impact.

The outcome

What it actually delivered.

$250M+
Spend analyzed in the pilot category
$10M+
Instant savings opportunity surfaced
0
New suppliers required to capture it

Same-profile parts identified across sites at 2–5× cost spread. Recoverable through supplier-to-supplier shift within the existing supply base — no requalification, no contract renegotiation, no organizational change.

What we need from you

Value first.
Integrations when you're ready.

The first round of value comes from data your team already exports every month — no IT project, no organizational restructuring, no new suppliers to qualify. ERP, PLM, and supplier-system integrations are a path to deeper value once the platform is producing, but they're never a prerequisite to getting started.

  • Drawing archives — ZIP / RAR / 7z trees as-is from PLM. We handle nested extraction.
  • Purchase history export — part number, supplier, unit cost, site, spend. One Excel or CSV.
  • 30 minutes / phase — one subject-matter expert on a per-phase alignment call.

Where integrations unlock more value (later, on your timeline):

  • ERP (SAP, Oracle, etc.) — real-time spend reconciliation and live supplier flow-through.
  • PLM (Teamcenter, Windchill, Aras) — automated revision deltas and ECO impact tracking.
  • Supplier portals — direct quote-to-order flow on consolidated parts.
PER-STAKEHOLDER DELIVERABLES Engineering lead drawings_to_locate.xlsx · hundreds of items missing_revisions.xlsx · ranked by impact 2 files delivered Procurement SME orphan_parts.xlsx · dozens of items mismatch_top_50.xlsx · 8-figure addressable 2 files delivered VP Supply Chain exec_summary.pdf · 4-page narrative taxonomy_overview.xlsx · category map 2 files delivered TOTAL CYCLE TIME 30 days · drop-off → first deliverable
What made it possible: AI-powered drawing extraction at scale. No human reviewed 31,000 folders — the platform did. The subject-matter experts only touched the exceptions. — Reference engagement, Phase 1 retrospective

Bring a category. We'll bring the savings map.

30-minute call: walk us through one of your machined-component categories. We'll come back with a sample mismatch report shape and a phased rollout estimate.